These days, environmental problems are becoming gradually more sever and people around the
world are looking for ways to solve these problems that are affecting human and other liv
ing species. In the material given, there is a claim that all of the remaining wilderness
should be preserved by the country. However, I think this is a suggestion not able to bein
g put into reality.First of all, taking this suggestion into action will impede the develo
pment of some countries. Some nations must rely on wilderness development in order to sust
ain their economy. They may be lacking natural resources and have to make use of every pos
sible land to promise the citizens’ well-being. For example, Dubai is a nation built on de
sert lands and sea. As a country located in a place that is unsuitable for human. The only
way to make the county prosperous is to make use of those wilderness. In a situation like
Dubai, it is almost impossible to ask it to preserve every wilderness in the land. For as
a nation, the top priority is to make sure the living standard of the people and the powe
r of the country. If preserving wilderness will impede those greatly, it is certainly unre
asonable to consider wilderness preservation first. Therefore, it is not possible to ask a
ll the nations to pass the law on preserving the wilderness.Another thing we should consid
er is that remaining wilderness does not necessarily benefit environment, and sometimes hu
man interactions are needed to protect the environment. Protecting environment is not some
thing that we can just let go of the hand. There are many issues that we should intervene
so that the environment could be saved. Taking wild fire into example, almost every year,
when the weather turns to be dry, there could be chances for a wild fire to start. Wild Fi
re could destroy the forest and also cause air pollution for the ash will spread in the ai
r and living things could inhale it to cause diseases. Preserving the wilderness cannot do
anything to help solve it, instead, it could let the fire do more harms. In a situation l
ike this, remaining wilderness is actually destroying it. There are also other cases that
human interactions are protecting the nature, such as the protection of endangered species
and cleaning out invading species. As a result, if our ultimate goal is to save the natur
e, we still should not pass the law to preserve any wilderness untouched.More importantly,
those actions boost economy at the same time can also save the environment. Many countrie
s have become aware of the importance of sustainable development and devote themselves int
o the coexistence of nature and economy. One of the most famous example is Singapore. Know
n as garden city, there are flowers, trees and many other plants on the sides of the roads
. Besides these, the airport in Singapore shows the perfect way to develop the economy at
the same time save the environment. The whole airport is more like a garden than a transpo
rtation station, covered with many plants. It is a very good way to help maintain the air
of the city fresh. What’s more, the beauty of the city attracts many tourists from other c
ountries to come to the city and in this way the economy is boosted. It is clear that ther
e are ways to make the economy coexist with environment. We should not view the two things
as completely contradict to each other. Therefore, this suggestion should not be taken in
to action and there are better way to preserve the environments.In the end, as there are m
any countries relying on developing the wilderness to sustain the function of itself, huma
n interactions can be important to preserve the environment and there are better ways than
the suggestion in the article given to protect the nature. We should not take the suggest
ion into reality.