Having determined this obvious fact of corresponding time-space sequence, the next
question to address is that of the origin of the object being perceived.
The question of “what it is" is directly related to the issue of “where it
came from," for you cannot answer one question without answering the
other. If you desire to elicit intelligent answers as to the nature of these
phenomena, it is necessary to ask intelligent questions. In order to ask
intelligent questions, it is necessary that you expand the framework of
reference out of which these questions are drawn.
Official investigation into the nature of three-dimensional
mechanical-type UFO events centers around explaining these
phenomena using the current premise of scientific thought. The core
assumption or root belief within the scientific dictum is that the
objectified Earth field of three-dimensional reality is the “only real
reality that exists." Phenomena must be explained within this terrestrialbased
scope of perception. Underlying and interwoven with this core
assumption are the ideas that the human species is the only “real
intelligent life form" in the universe, and that the three-dimensional
Earth field of perceivable reality is the only “real" reality and thus all
things must be explained within the perceivable confines of that reality.
In researching UFO phenomena the officials tend to look for
data and correlations that will prove their own theories and
assumptions, rather than investigating the phenomena as an active
reality from which there is knowledge to gain. More effort is put into
disproving the reality of the phenomena than is applied to investigating
what information the phenomena is presenting that will add to the
understanding of how reality works.
In regard to three-dimensional mechanical UFO sightings the
first series of intelligent questions that should be asked involve how the
object behaves in relation to the known laws of physics as they are
presently understood. Does the object exhibit behavior consistent with
those laws, or are there anomalies in its exhibited characteristics that
seem to contradict or push beyond the scope of those “laws" as they are
presently known? If more attention is paid to such questions, the
phenomena themselves would lead researchers to add information to
their present bank of laws.
Time, space and perception are intimately intertwined. Science
and physics have already lent credence to the “theory" that time is not
linear in nature as once thought.
- MCEO teachings